Case 4112035/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Hideout Scot Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4112035/2021
- Decision date
- 23 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a rule 21 judgment because the respondent presented no response and the decision was made on the material in the claimant's ET1. It found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of April, June and July 2021. For April, the claimant should have received £1,354.32 but received £781.31, leaving £573.01 due. For June, the claimant should have received £1,276.50 but received £781.31, leaving £495.19 due. For July, the claimant should have received £511 and received nothing. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,579.20 in respect of those wage deductions.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,026.56. On the unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal dismissed the claim because the claimant did not have the two years' service needed to qualify for unfair dismissal protection under section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment was entered on 23 December 2021 and is dated 15 December 2021. No separate findings on compensation, interest, or other remedies are recorded beyond the two sums awarded for wages and holiday entitlement.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered unpaid sums for April, June and July 2021, calculated as the differences set out in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,579 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; classified here as holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,027 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have the two years' service required by section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,606
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.