Case 4112050/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4112050/2019 Open Preliminary Hearing (OPH) Held in person on October 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms N Pennycook v Represented by:15 Self Kingdom Services Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4112050/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
- Venue
- person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4112050/2019 Open Preliminary Hearing (OPH) Held in person on October 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms N Pennycook
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing held in person on 5 October 2021 before Employment Judge Alan Strain. The claimant, Ms N Pennycook, appeared on her own behalf and the respondent, Kingdom Services Group Limited, was represented by Ms E Evans-Jarvis, consultant.
The only recorded decision is that the respondent’s application for strike-out, failing which a deposit order, was refused. Oral reasons were given to the parties at the conclusion of the hearing.
The judgment does not record any substantive decision on the underlying employment claims and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the open preliminary hearing, the respondent’s application for strike-out, failing which a deposit order, was refused. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.