Case 4112074/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Siatka v Ian Kennedy and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 4112074/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr M Siatka
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the claim to include Westbeach Limited as a second respondent. It also recorded that the claim against the first respondent, Ian Kennedy, was dismissed. The tribunal then held that the claims had been lodged out of time.
The tribunal found that, even if it had not been reasonably practicable to lodge the claim in time, the delay in lodging it thereafter was not reasonable. On that basis, it held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims and dismissed them.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself does not specify the head of claim. The tribunal held the claim was lodged out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Written pay statement claim inferred from the case listing; the judgment itself does not specify the head of claim. The tribunal held the claim was lodged out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.