Case 4112226/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Sherry v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 4112226/2012
- Decision date
- 7 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms L Sherry
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 January 2019, Employment Judge Frances Eccles gave Ms L Sherry an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 January 2019, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The respondent was Clackmannanshire Council, which was represented by a solicitor; the claimant was not represented.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded. The judgment is limited to the procedural disposal of the claim by strike-out, with the judgment dated 7 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not restate the substantive claim label, but the gov.uk listing category for the case is Equal Pay Act, so this has been classified as equal_pay. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.