Case 4112307/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112307/2021 Mr A R Khan v Multicultural Elderly Care Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112307/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112307/2021 Mr A R Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21. The respondent, Multicultural Elderly Care Centre, did not resist the claim and the tribunal proceeded to determine the matter on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period July to December 2021. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr A R Khan £4,596.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, recorded as 5 weeks. It ordered payment of £957.50 for that element. The total sum ordered was £5,553.50. The hearing listed on 17 January 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period July to December 2021 and was ordered to pay £4,596.00. | Upheld | — | £4,596 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of 5 weeks and was ordered to pay £957.50. | Upheld | — | £958 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,554
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.