Case 4112329/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112329/2019 Mr A Nelson v Bees And Eaves Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4112329/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112329/2019 Mr A Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented and the Employment Judge decided the case on the available material. The respondent was Bees And Eaves Limited and the claimant was Mr A Nelson. No hearing evidence is recorded in the extracted text beyond the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £680. | Upheld | — | £680 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages were assessed at £120, calculated as 2 weeks at £60. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £180, calculated as 3 weeks at £60. | Upheld | — | £180 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £980
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.