Case 4112384/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Houston v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112384/2021
- Decision date
- 6 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Houston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed by Tesco Stores Limited on 11 September 2021 after a disciplinary process concerning alleged failure to follow replenishment procedures, behaviour towards cleaning staff, and working in a way said to create health and safety risks. The tribunal found that the respondent relied on conduct as the reason for dismissal, which was a potentially fair reason under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Applying the Burchell test, the tribunal accepted that the dismissing and appeal managers genuinely believed the claimant had committed misconduct, and that there were reasonable grounds for that belief. The tribunal referred to the claimant's admissions that he knew the replenishment process but chose to work differently, the live final written warning, witness accounts from cleaners and a colleague, and CCTV footage showing the condition of the aisle.
The tribunal found that the investigation was sufficiently thorough: the investigator spoke to the manager who raised the concerns, relevant witnesses, reviewed CCTV, and met the claimant three times. It also found that dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses, particularly given the live final warning and the claimant's indication that he would likely depart from the process again. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.98(1) ERA 1996
- s.98(2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379
- Burchell test
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt [2003] IRLR 23
- band of reasonable responses
- British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift [1981] IRLR 91
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones [1982] IRLR 439
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.