Case 4112386/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ian Aird v Marc Allan Builders — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112386/2021
- Decision date
- 6 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
- Venue
- person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ian Aird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not lodge an ET3 and was neither present nor represented. The tribunal heard from Mr Ian Aird, accepted his evidence as credible and reliable, and found that he began work as a joiner for Marc Allan Builders on 12 October 2020 at £15 per hour for 40 hours per week. The tribunal found he was usually paid one week in arrears, that no written contract or statement of terms had been issued, and that on 8 August 2021 Mr Allan told him not to return to work after an earlier telephone conversation about a minor plumbing incident.
The unfair dismissal claim was not pursued. The claimant accepted that he did not have two years' continuous service and withdrew that claim, and the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52.
On the remaining contractual and statutory claims, the tribunal found that the claimant had been summarily dismissed without prior notice and that there was no basis for summary termination. It treated the failure to give one week's notice as a breach of contract and awarded £477.75, using the claimant's last net weekly pay as the measure of loss. It also found that the claimant had taken no paid leave in 2021, that his holiday entitlement had been shown as reducing from 28 days to 9.97 days without explanation, and that 18 days' accrued untaken holiday pay succeeded under the Working Time Regulations, producing an award of £1,710.35.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had not been paid for the week beginning 2 August 2021 to 6 August 2021. It held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £477.75 in respect of that deduction. The monetary awards therefore totalled £2,665.85.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant accepted he did not have the necessary two years' continuous service and withdrew the claim; it was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been summarily dismissed on 8 August 2021 without prior notice and awarded one week's net pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £478 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal accepted the claimant had taken no paid leave in 2021 and awarded pay for 18 days (3.58 weeks) of accrued untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,710 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid the claimant for the week beginning 2 August 2021 and held that sum was unlawfully deducted from wages. | Upheld | — | £478 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,666
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.