Case 4112405/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4112405/2021 v Mrs E Bolalek Forth Care Limited (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112405/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4112405/2021
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 15 November 2021 and no response was entered within the time required by the Employment Tribunal Rules. The respondent was later placed into creditors’ voluntary liquidation on 16 May 2022, and the liquidators indicated that they did not intend to enter the proceedings and that there were no funds in the liquidation to meet the claim.
On the available material, the Employment Judge determined liability without a hearing under Rule 21, but did not determine remedy. The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, redundancy pay, notice pay and holiday pay all succeeded. The second and third respondents were removed from the proceedings. Remedy was left to be determined at a hearing if required.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy pay claim succeeded; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim succeeded; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim succeeded; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.