Case 4112433/2019 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112433/2019 Mrs P Lovie v Represented by: Ms M McGrady - Solicitor Working On Wellbeing Ltd t/a Optima Health — 2020

Case reference: 4112433/2019
Decision date: 27 May 2020
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Nicol Hosie

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112433/2019 Mrs P Lovie

Respondent

Represented by: Ms M McGrady - Solicitor Working On Wellbeing Ltd t/a Optima Health

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Nicol Hosie recorded on 21 May 2020 that Mrs P Lovie's complaints of protected disclosure detriment and dismissal under sections 47B(1) and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and health and safety detriment and dismissal under sections 44(1)(c)(i) and (ii) and 100(1)(c), had been withdrawn by the claimant.

The Tribunal therefore dismissed those complaints under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not contain findings on liability or remedy beyond recording the withdrawal and dismissal.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	Protected disclosure detriment and dismissal under sections 47B(1) and 103A ERA 1996. The judgment states that the complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under Rule 52.	Withdrawn	—	—
Other	Health and safety detriment and dismissal under sections 44(1)(c)(i) and (ii) and 100(1)(c) ERA 1996. The judgment states that the complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under Rule 52.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.