Case 4112473/2018 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112473/2018 Mr T Rzepniewski v Represented by: Tower Bakery — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112473/2018
- Decision date
- 11 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112473/2018 Mr T Rzepniewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr T Rzepniewski’s claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings on liability, evidence, or remedy are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment is confined to the procedural dismissal following withdrawal, and it does not specify any separate award or substantive determination on the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not specify any substantive claim type in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.