Case 4112509/2018 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112509/2018 Mr D Duncan v Crummock (Scotland) Limited — 2019

Case reference: 4112509/2018
Decision date: 27 March 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Frances Eccles

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112509/2018 Mr D Duncan

Respondent

Crummock (Scotland) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Frances Eccles decided the case on 27 March 2019. The respondent was Crummock (Scotland) Limited (in liquidation). The judgment records no hearing evidence or detailed findings beyond the tribunal's decision on the papers.

The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. On that basis, the tribunal made a protective award and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 1 June 2018.

The extracted judgment does not state a monetary sum for the award, and no split between heads of loss is given. The only remedy recorded is remuneration for the protected period. No discrimination or other separate claims are identified in the judgment text.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Rule 21 judgment. No response was presented. The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and awarded remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 1 June 2018, but no monetary figure is stated in the extracted text.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.