Case 4112517/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. N Whyte v Scotnet (International) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112517/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. N Whyte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Aberdeen by CVP on 8 February 2022 before Employment Judge B Beyzade, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The tribunal dealt with two monetary claims. The claimant withdrew his claim for outstanding wages, and that claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal then recorded agreement on the claimant’s unpaid holiday pay complaint. The respondent offered £247.45 net, the claimant agreed to accept that sum in satisfaction of the holiday pay claim, and the tribunal ordered payment of £247.45 in respect of holiday pay between 8 March 2021 and 18 November 2021. The order also recorded that tax and national insurance were to be accounted for and remitted to HMRC by the respondent, and that the payment was due immediately. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and written reasons were not provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant withdrew his claim for outstanding wages, and the tribunal dismissed it pursuant to Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the respondent offered £247.45 net, the claimant agreed to accept that sum in satisfaction of his unpaid holiday pay claim, and an order was made under Rule 64. | Settled | — | £247 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £247
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- Rule 64 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.