Case 4112538/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112538/2018 Mrs D Dabrowa v Pure Cleaning (Scotland) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112538/2018
- Decision date
- 10 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112538/2018 Mrs D Dabrowa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined on the papers under rule 21 because no response had been presented. Employment Judge F Jane Garvie issued judgment on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 28 September 2018.
The tribunal found that Pure Cleaning (Scotland) Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs D Dabrowa’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,722.60 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £368.01 for that claim. The judgment does not record any additional heads of loss or separate legal reasoning beyond those findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and was ordered to pay £1,722.60. | Upheld | — | £1,723 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £368.01. | Upheld | — | £368 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,091
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.