Case 4112539/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Mahikal v Oceanic Hair and Beauty Studios — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112539/2018
- Decision date
- 27 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Mahikal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge Robert Gall issued a judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Oceanic Hair and Beauty Studios had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered it to pay £311.24.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £54.81. The hearing listed for 5 October 2018 was cancelled. The judgment was dated 22 August 2018 and entered in the register on 27 August 2018.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £311 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded in respect of notice pay; the tribunal ordered damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £55 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £366
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.