Case 4112581/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112581/2018 Mr G Reynolds v Neptis (Media) Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112581/2018
- Decision date
- 22 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112581/2018 Mr G Reynolds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a rule 21 judgment after no response had been presented by the respondent. On the available material, Employment Judge Shona MacLean found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and that the claimant was owed payment for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £122.48, described as 2 days’ pay. In addition, it ordered payment of £180 by way of commission due to the claimant. The monetary awards totalled £726.38.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £423.90 for 54 hours at £7.85 per hour as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £424 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded £122.48, described as 2 days' pay for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £122 |
| Other | Awarded £180 by way of commission due to the claimant; the judgment does not give a separate legal label for this award. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £726
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.