Case 4112584/2018 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112584/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2018 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mr William Chalmers v Juicy Lucy’s Burger Company Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112584/2018
- Decision date
- 26 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112584/2018 Held in Glasgow on October 2018 Employment Judge: W A Meiklejohn Mr William Chalmers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn found on the available material that Juicy Lucy’s Burger Company Limited had failed to pay Mr William Chalmers his holiday entitlement. The respondent was ordered to pay £170.88, subject to the appropriate deduction for income tax and National Insurance contributions.
The judgment records no other claims or contested issues, and it does not set out any separate reasoning beyond the finding that holiday pay remained unpaid. It is a judge-alone decision with no lay members listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £170.88 less the appropriate deduction for income tax and National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £171 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £171
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.