Case 4112588/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112588/2018 Mr G Brodie v Kestrel Fencing Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112588/2018
- Decision date
- 20 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112588/2018 Mr G Brodie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Frances Eccles found that the claimant, Mr G Brodie, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Damages were ordered in the sum of £6,145, calculated as 11 weeks at £559 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,382, calculated as 16.5 weeks at £508 per week. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 5 October 2018 was cancelled.
The holiday pay claim is recorded as having been withdrawn and dismissed. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning on that claim or any additional remedy beyond the two monetary awards identified above.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages ordered at £6,145, calculated as 11 weeks x £559. | Upheld | — | £6,145 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,382, calculated as 16.5 weeks x £508. | Upheld | — | £8,382 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim had been withdrawn and was dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,527
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.