Case 4112589/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Brown v Andron Contract Services Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112589/2018
- Decision date
- 21 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 3 December 2018 the Tribunal gave Mrs C Brown an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 December 2018, or to request a hearing, to explain why the unfair dismissal part of the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal part of the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. No substantive determination of unfair dismissal was made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the unfair dismissal part had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.