Case 4112610/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112610/2018 Mr M Littler v R J Blasting (Scotland) Ltd and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112610/2018
- Decision date
- 12 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whitcombe
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112610/2018 Mr M Littler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant’s complaint of disability discrimination had been withdrawn. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the complaint under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment also states that it does not relate to the claim for victimization under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. No remedy is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of disability discrimination had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.