Case 4112613/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Wilson v Fullerton Street Café Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112613/2018
- Decision date
- 27 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent presented no response, and Employment Judge Robert Gall issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that Mrs G Wilson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,400, described in the judgment as 8 weeks' pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,100. The judgment records that this was calculated by reference to the claimant's age, her 8 complete years of service, and a weekly wage of £425.
The judgment does not record any other claims or any separate statutory award components beyond the two sums ordered. The combined monetary total from the two awards is £8,500.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,400, described as 8 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £3,400 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,100, calculated by reference to her age, length of service and weekly wage. | Upheld | — | £5,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.