Case 4112728/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112728/2018 Mrs Marie Kelly v Ladbrokes Coral Betting Gaming Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112728/2018
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112728/2018 Mrs Marie Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs Marie Kelly on her complaint of unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent, Ladbrokes Coral Betting Gaming Ltd, did not enter a response within the time required after the claim form was sent on 30 July 2018.
Employment Judge G Ian McPherson decided on the available material that a determination could properly be made without a hearing as to liability. The judgment records only that the claim succeeded; the amount of any remedy was not determined in this judgment.
The tribunal stated that remedy would be decided at a separate hearing listed for Wednesday, 10 October 2018 at 11.30am, in accordance with the Notice of Claim issued by the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to enter a response. Liability was decided on the available material without a hearing; remedy was deferred to a later hearing fixed for 10 October 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.