Case 4112732/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112732/2018 Ms Christine Orr v Poundworld — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112732/2018
- Decision date
- 5 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112732/2018 Ms Christine Orr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response within the time required by Rule 16. On the material available, the Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing, but not remedy.
The claimant, Ms Christine Orr, succeeded in her complaint of unfair dismissal against Poundworld. The judgment records only the liability decision and does not set out findings on the underlying facts of dismissal beyond the decision that the complaint succeeded.
The remedy due to the claimant was not determined in this judgment. The Employment Judge directed that remedy would be decided at a later hearing before an Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to lodge a response. Liability was determined on the available material without a hearing; remedy was reserved to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.