Case 4112747/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112747/2015 Mr D Dickie v North Lanarkshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4112747/2015
- Decision date
- 22 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112747/2015 Mr D Dickie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting. A letter sent on 16 October 2023 seeking confirmation of the claimant's intentions was returned because the claimant no longer resided at the address provided on the ET1. The claimant had not provided a new address, so the Tribunal could not communicate with him or give notice under rule 37(2). The Tribunal assumed he no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment refers only to "the claim" and does not describe the cause of action. Claim type is based on the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment refers only to "the claim" and does not describe the cause of action. Claim type and protected characteristic are based on the gov.uk listing category supplied in Layer 1. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.