Case 4112747/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4112747/2018 Mr C Short v Represented by: Mr J Boyle - Solicitor Fireworx Scotland Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112747/2018
- Decision date
- 21 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4112747/2018 Mr C Short
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew three complaints: minimum wage breach, holiday pay breach, and breach of the Working Time Regulations. It then dismissed those complaints under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy were recorded beyond the procedural dismissal following withdrawal. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Nicol Hosie on 20 December 2018 and entered in the register on 21 December 2018.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint of minimum wage breach was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint of holiday pay breach was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Complaint of breach of the Working Time Regulations was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.