Case 4112762/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112762/2015 Ms J Gorman v North Lanarkshire Council — 2022
- Case reference
- 4112762/2015
- Decision date
- 15 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112762/2015 Ms J Gorman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons record that, on 17 June 2022, the claimant was asked whether she disagreed with the respondent's application to strike out the claim. That correspondence was returned indicating that the claimant no longer lived at the address given on the ET1, and the claimant had not advised the Tribunal of a new address.
The Tribunal stated that, without a current address, it could not communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 37(2). It assumed in those circumstances that the claimant no longer wished to pursue the claim, and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Claim type is indicated by the gov.uk listing category. The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out the substantive allegations. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim type is indicated by the gov.uk listing category. The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not set out the substantive allegations. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.