Case 4112767/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Hamilton v Mr Alan McLean and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4112767/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Hamilton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim on 25 July 2018 alleging unpaid wages and holiday pay. The tribunal heard evidence only from the claimant, as neither respondent attended or responded. It found that Mr Paul Hamilton had been interviewed by Mr Alan Maclean for a chef position at The Corran Inn, started work on 14 May 2018, was paid in cash for the first two weeks, and then was not paid further wages despite repeated requests.
The tribunal found that the claimant was employed by Mr Alan Maclean. That conclusion was based on the fact that Mr Maclean interviewed him, gave instructions, made wage payments, and that the claimant understood Mr Maclean ran The Corran Inn. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not received any contract, payslips, or written letter of offer.
The tribunal held that the claims were well-founded and ordered Mr Maclean to pay £612 gross for 72 hours' unpaid wages, £136 for 2 days' holiday pay, and £160 in respect of tips, calculated at £40 per week for 4 weeks. The total monetary award was £908.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award on this head covered £612 gross for 72 hours' unpaid wages and £160 for tips. | Upheld | — | £772 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 2 days' holiday pay, calculated as 8 hours x 2 days x £8.50 per hour. | Upheld | — | £136 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £908
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.