Case 4112785/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112785/2015 Mrs L Lennon v North Lanarkshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4112785/2015
- Decision date
- 5 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112785/2015 Mrs L Lennon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 3 November 2023 the claimant was given until 17 November 2023 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The judgment text itself does not describe the substantive equal pay claim; this classification is based on the listing category provided in the case context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The judgment text itself does not describe the substantive sex discrimination claim; this classification is based on the listing category provided in the case context. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.