Case 4112798/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112798/2015 Mrs M McAleaney v North Lanarkshire Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4112798/2015
- Decision date
- 4 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112798/2015 Mrs M McAleaney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting, and the tribunal sent correspondence on 3 November 2023 asking the claimant to confirm her intention regarding the claim. That correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1, and the claimant had not provided a new address.
The tribunal recorded that it could not communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 37(2). In those circumstances it assumed that the claimant no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' for not being actively pursued, but the extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.