Case 4112801/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 105435/2010 & 4112801/2015 Mrs M McCafferty v North Lanarkshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4112801/2015
- Decision date
- 18 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 105435/2010 & 4112801/2015 Mrs M McCafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal had asked the claimant on 3 November 2023 to confirm by 17 November 2023 why the claims should not be struck out. The claimant said she wished to proceed. The respondent then informed the Tribunal that the claims had been settled in December 2016, and the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 5 February 2024 asking her to confirm whether that was correct and whether the claims were to be withdrawn. No response was received.
In those circumstances, the Tribunal struck out the claims because they had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment refers to the claims collectively and strikes them out under rule 37(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued. The listing category identifies the matter as Equal Pay Act, but the judgment does not set out the substantive equal pay issues. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.