Case 4112828/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112828/2015 Mrs M Quinn v North Lanarkshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4112828/2015
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112828/2015 Mrs M Quinn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The claimant's solicitors withdrew from acting. The Tribunal asked the claimant whether she wished to pursue the claim, and later wrote on 6 November 2023 saying that an Employment Judge was considering strike out unless she gave written reasons by 20 November 2023 or asked for a hearing.
The claimant told the Tribunal she would contact her solicitor to ascertain the status of her claim, but there was no further contact. The Tribunal concluded that she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The listing category identifies the claim as Equal Pay Act, but the judgment itself does not describe the substantive equal pay issues; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.