Case 4112864/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112864/2015 Mrs H Whisker v North Lanarkshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4112864/2015
- Decision date
- 30 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112864/2015 Mrs H Whisker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting, and the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking whether she wished to pursue the claim. After a further letter dated 6 November 2023 warned that strike out was being considered and invited reasons or a hearing request by 20 November 2023, the claimant said she would contact the union about the status of her claim. The Tribunal received no further contact and concluded that the claimant no longer wished to pursue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. The equal pay classification follows the case listing/category context rather than an express description within the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.