Case 4112897/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112897/2019 Mrs D Payton v No Appearance Cornerstone Community Care — 2023
- Case reference
- 4112897/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4112897/2019 Mrs D Payton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 March 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie struck out Mrs D Payton's claim against Cornerstone Community Care under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d).
The reasons record that on 16 February 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking for written reasons by 23 February 2023 or for a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. That letter was returned marked "gone away".
The claimant's solicitors told the Tribunal that they had no further details for her. The tribunal noted that the claimant had a duty to maintain contact with both her solicitors and the Tribunal, and said that, having regard to the overriding objective, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim; it records only that the claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.