Case 4112921/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112921/2019 & 4112938/2019 Mr R Robertson v Cornerstone Community Care — 2023
- Case reference
- 4112921/2019
- Decision date
- 3 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4112921/2019 & 4112938/2019 Mr R Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claims had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had written to the claimants on 27 and 28 February 2023 asking whether they intended to proceed, but no reply was received. It then contacted the claimants' previous representatives on 6 and 10 March 2023 to check for alternative addresses, and they confirmed on 15 March 2023 that they held the same details as the Tribunal Office.
The Tribunal found that the claimants had failed to give an acceptable reason why strike-out judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The claims were therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The gov.uk listing category indicates Trade Union Membership, but the judgment itself only states that the claims were struck out under rule 37 because they had not been actively pursued. The specific pleaded cause of action is not described in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.