Case 4112952/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jarvis v Cuchulain Construction Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4112952/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emma Bell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jarvis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Glasgow before Employment Judge Emma Bell on 17 October 2018, upheld two money claims brought by Mr R Jarvis against Cuchulain Construction Ltd. It ordered the respondent to pay £185.75 as a sum unlawfully deducted contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and £258.01 as accrued but unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The judgment does not record any separate findings on liability beyond those two monetary orders, and it does not set out any further remedy calculation, interest, or additional award. The total sum ordered was £443.76.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £185.75 as a sum unlawfully deducted contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £186 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal ordered payment of £258.01 as accrued but unpaid holiday pay pursuant to the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £258 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £444
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.