Case 4113037/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Singh v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113037/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Singh
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Singh presented a claim of non-payment of wages on 15 November 2019 against Real People Casting Scotland. In its response, the respondent raised a preliminary issue about time bar and maintained that the claimant was self-employed and not entitled to the payment claimed.
The case was listed for hearing on 14 February 2020 before Employment Judge S MacLean in Glasgow. The claimant did not appear. The tribunal recorded that attempts were made unsuccessfully to contact him by telephone and email.
In those circumstances, the tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not decide the underlying wage entitlement issue on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim presented as a non-payment of wages claim. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 after the claimant did not appear at the hearing; the response had also raised time bar and self-employment points, but the tribunal did not determine the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.