Case 4113055/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113055/2018 Miss C Vrachliotis v Surf Dogs Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113055/2018
- Decision date
- 12 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113055/2018 Miss C Vrachliotis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss C Vrachliotis, presented a holiday pay claim after working for Surf Dogs from 23 November 2017 until 14 July 2018. No response was presented, so the Employment Judge issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material and cancelled the listed hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s employment lasted 33 weeks, that her weekly gross pay was £490, and that she had taken one day’s holiday during the employment. It calculated holiday entitlement on termination as 5.6 x 33/52 = 3.55 weeks, or 17.75 days, less one day taken, leaving 16.75 days, or 3.35 weeks.
On that basis, the tribunal calculated 3.35 x £490 = £1,641.50 and ordered the respondent to pay £1,642, rounded to the nearest whole pound. The judgment also directed that the claimant account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on the sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: no response was presented. The tribunal accepted the claimant’s holiday entitlement calculation and ordered payment of £1,642, rounded from £1,641.50. | Upheld | — | £1,642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,642
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.