Case 4113115/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113115/2018 Mrs Elaine Murdoch v Yasin Retail Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113115/2018
- Decision date
- 11 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian Mcpherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113115/2018 Mrs Elaine Murdoch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material after the respondent presented no response to the claim. On reconsideration, following an email from the claimant dated 1 October 2018, the Employment Judge revoked the earlier rule 21 judgment dated 27 September 2018 and then determined the claim by reference to the claimant's calculation of claim intimated on 23 September 2018.
The tribunal found that Mrs Elaine Murdoch had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,616. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £256.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,744. The hearing listed for 31 October 2018 was cancelled. The combined amount awarded on the judgment was £9,616.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,616. | Upheld | — | £5,616 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £256. | Upheld | — | £256 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,744. | Upheld | — | £3,744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,616
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.