Case 4113121/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113121/2018 Mrs Joyce Hanley v Yasin Retail Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113121/2018
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113121/2018 Mrs Joyce Hanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because the respondent presented no response. The Employment Judge decided the claim on the available material and on the claimant's calculation of claim intimated to the tribunal on 23 September 2018.
The tribunal found that Mrs Joyce Hanley had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,744. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £256 for that unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,496. The hearing listed for 31 October 2018 was cancelled. The combined monetary award on the face of the judgment was £6,496.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,744. | Upheld | — | £3,744 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £256. | Upheld | — | £256 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,496. | Upheld | — | £2,496 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,496
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.