Case 4113131/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4113131/2018 Mr F Carson v Community Safety Glasgow — 2023
- Case reference
- 4113131/2018
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4113131/2018 Mr F Carson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr F Carson's claim against Community Safety Glasgow under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 15 June 2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 6 July 2023, or to request a hearing so that the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Frances Eccles ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive liability finding or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.