Case 4113145/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113145/2018 Mr J Clark v Maplin Electronics (in administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4113145/2018
- Decision date
- 23 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113145/2018 Mr J Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment of Employment Judge Robert Gall, dated 23 May 2019, records that Mr J Clark's claim against Maplin Electronics Ltd (in Administration) was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal stated that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success for the purposes of rule 37(1)(a). The judgment also states that the administrator did not consent to the claim proceeding.
The extracted text does not identify the substantive nature of the claim, so the record is limited to the strike-out outcome and the reason given by the tribunal. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.