Case 4113175/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gregor MacMillan v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113175/2018
- Decision date
- 31 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Gregor MacMillan
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Gregor MacMillan presented a claim on 9 August 2018 alleging that he had not been paid his final week's pay. The respondent did not enter a response. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 17 September 2018 asking for details of the amount said to be owed, and sent a reminder on 1 October 2018, but he did not reply. The claim was then allowed to proceed to a hearing listed for 26 October 2018.
The claimant did not attend the hearing. A clerk telephoned the number given on the claim form but there was no response. The Employment Judge recorded that the claimant had been given an opportunity to provide details of the claim in writing and to attend in person, but had taken up neither opportunity and had not contacted the tribunal to explain his position. In those circumstances, the tribunal decided to dismiss the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant alleged he had not been paid his final week's pay. The tribunal dismissed the claim because he did not provide the requested pay details, did not respond to follow-up correspondence, and did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.