Case 4113181/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113181/2018 Mr T P Jenkins v Represented by: Ms D Flanigan Solicitor Glenapp Estate Company Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4113181/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joseph
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113181/2018 Mr T P Jenkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment records that Mr T P Jenkins's claim against Glenapp Estate Company Limited was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment is brief and contains no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, no liability determination, and no remedy assessment. The only recorded procedural outcome is dismissal following withdrawal.
The judgment is dated 27 February 2019 and was entered in the register on 11 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not specify the underlying claim type, but the case listing identifies the matter as unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.