Case 4113184/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4113184/2014 Mr A Binnie v Falkirk Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4113184/2014
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4113184/2014 Mr A Binnie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, specifically under rule 38(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant until 26 May 2025 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out under rule 38 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out under rule 38 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.