Case 4113224/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4113224/2014 Mr M Kenny v Falkirk Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4113224/2014
- Decision date
- 9 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4113224/2014 Mr M Kenny
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting, and a strike out warning letter was sent after the claimant failed to respond to a status enquiry asking him to confirm his intention regarding the claim. The correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address given on the ET1.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant had not provided a new address, meaning the Tribunal could not communicate with him or give notice under rule 37(2). It assumed that he no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.