Case 4113339/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113339/2018 Mrs S Niven v The George And Abbotsford Hotel — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113339/2018
- Decision date
- 9 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113339/2018 Mrs S Niven
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. The tribunal decided the claim on the available material and did not record any hearing evidence or further reasons beyond the orders made.
The tribunal found that The George And Abbotsford Hotel had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs S Niven's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £30 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £324.95 for that element. The combined sum awarded was £354.95.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £30. | Upheld | — | £30 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £324.95. | Upheld | — | £325 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £355
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.