Case 4113368/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113368/2018 Mrs Margaret Johnston v Govanhill Youth Project — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113368/2018
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113368/2018 Mrs Margaret Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge G Ian McPherson. The claim form was sent to the respondent on 22 August 2018, but the respondent did not enter a response within the required 28 days. On the material before the tribunal, the judge decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of unfair constructive dismissal, failure to pay notice pay, and failure to pay holiday pay all succeeded. The judgment did not quantify any award at that stage. Instead, it stated that the remedy due for the successful complaints would be determined at a final hearing fixed for 31 October 2018, with the hearing time extended to two hours.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Rule 21 judgment on liability only; remedy to be determined at the final hearing on 31 October 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment on liability only; remedy to be determined at the final hearing on 31 October 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment on liability only; remedy to be determined at the final hearing on 31 October 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.