Case 4113372/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113372/2015 & Others Mr N Gibson & Others v Glasgow Kelvin College — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113372/2015
- Decision date
- 13 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113372/2015 & Others Mr N Gibson & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claims brought by Mr N Gibson and others against Glasgow Kelvin College were withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or compensation are recorded in the judgment text. The decision is a short procedural disposal only, dated 13 September 2018, and the extracted text does not identify the underlying legal issues beyond the withdrawal and dismissal order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and therefore dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not identify the underlying legal claim type; the case was listed on the GOV.UK site under Working Time Regulations, but that is not stated in the judgment itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.