Case 4113406/2019 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case no 4113406/2019 Held at Edinburgh on and September and October 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr Craig White v Represented by:15 Mr E Mowat - Solicitor Department for Work and Pensions — 2021
- Case reference
- 4113406/2019
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sandy Meiklejohn
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case no 4113406/2019 Held at Edinburgh on and September and October 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr Craig White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal decided that Mr White's claims of unfair dismissal and breach of contract did not succeed. The judgment records that the hearing took place in Edinburgh on 29 and 30 September and 1 October 2021 before Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn. The claims were dismissed in full.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the written judgment, and no such request was made. The extracted judgment therefore does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasoning in writing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.