Case 4113418/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4113418/2019 & 4113420/2019 P Mrs J Brewster v Harry’s Bakery Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4113418/2019
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4113418/2019 & 4113420/2019 P Mrs J Brewster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants, Mrs Brewster and Ms Drinkwater, brought claims for redundancy payment and notice pay following termination of their employment. The respondent resisted the claims only to the extent of disputing the initial sums claimed. Following a case management hearing on 29 May 2020, the parties agreed the amounts due in respect of each claimant.
The tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and ordered the respondent to pay the agreed sums. For Mrs Brewster, the award was £1,477.80 as a redundancy payment and £985.20 as damages for breach of contract for failure to give notice. For Ms Drinkwater, the award was £1,182.24 as a redundancy payment and £788.16 as damages for breach of contract for failure to give notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded redundancy payments for both claimants: £1,477.80 to Mrs Brewster and £1,182.24 to Ms Drinkwater. | Upheld | — | £2,660 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded damages for breach of contract (failure to give notice of termination of employment) for both claimants: £985.20 to Mrs Brewster and £788.16 to Ms Drinkwater. | Upheld | — | £1,773 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,433
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.